![]() In the US, widescale use of private property and civilian participation in defense activity are not feasible until the development of a grave crisis. Russian historical experience with murderous invaders, most recently in World War II, has made authoritarian defense measures involving civilians and property in peacetime quite acceptable in their culture. To restore the balance, a great reduction in vulnerability can be achieved most economically by planning a US counterevacuation as a response to a Soviet evacuation. This asymmetry in vulnerability, if allowed to persist, would seriously weaken the bargaining position of the US President. Without a corresponding evacuation, the US could lose from 50 to 70 percent of its population. If they should successfully implement their plan, a subsequent nuclear exchange with the United States would cost them far fewer casualties than they suffered in World War II. Their plans include construction of expedient shelters in the outlying areas and continued operation of their essential industry by commuting workers. The Soviet Union has highly developed plans to evacuate their population centers in a nuclear confrontation. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |